Use of Favipiravir for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the Setting of Hospitel.

Objective: In a setting with a limited capacity for hospitalization, "hospitels" have been developed by using hotels as extension healthcare facilities for patients with mild illness. This study examined the clinical evidence of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were treated with favipiravir, the main medication for treating COVID-19, in the hospitel setting in Thailand. Methods: We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical information, medication treatment, and outcome data for all patients who received favipiravir for COVID-19 during admission to a hospitel from April 27, 2021, to July 2, 2021. Risk factors for adults who could not complete treatment in a hospitel and who required hospitel transfer were analyzed. Results: In total, 421 patients were included in the study. Most patients (94.5%) received favipiravir to treat COVID-19 pneumonia. Adjunctive corticosteroids were prescribed to 42.3% of patients. Concerning the treatment outcome, 83.6% of patients completed treatment at a hospitel, and only two deaths occurred. No serious adverse drug reactions were observed. On multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.10, P=0.002), dyspnea (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.25-6.44, P=0.013), loss of taste (OR = 107.63; 95% CI = 1.24-9337.39, P=0.040), corticosteroid use (OR = 12.56; 95% CI = 3.65-43.18, P < 0.001), and an extended duration of favipiravir use (OR = 16.91; 95% CI = 7.29-39.24, P < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of hospitel transfer. Conclusions: Low rates of hospitel transfer and mortality were observed in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients treated with favipiravir at hospitel. Caution might be required in elderly patients, patients with dyspnea or a loss of taste, and patients receiving a 10-day course of favipiravir or adjunctive corticosteroids because these patients might require further management in the hospitel.

Role of clinical pharmacists in telemonitoring for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical pharmacists actively participate in patient care via patients' medication use. Yet the setting of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) limits patient contact with healthcare personnel. We aimed to review the services provided and drug-related problems detected using telemonitoring methods to guide clinical pharmacists in providing service in treating COVID-19 patients. COMMENT: At a tertiary care hospital in Thailand, clinical pharmacists provided pharmaceutical care services for COVID-19 patients via telemonitoring using the hospital's computerized physician order entry system. The pharmacists were able to provide therapeutic drug monitoring services, especially for anticoagulants. Many patients were considered special populations, with individualized requirements for drug dosing. Some adverse drug reactions were observed. Drug-related problems were mostly related to medication use in critically ill patients. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Telemonitoring is a viable method for clinical pharmacists to provide pharmaceutical care and meet the challenges posed by treating patients with COVID-19.

Microbial epidemiology and risk factors for relapse in gram-negative bacteria catheter-related bloodstream infection with a pilot prospective study in patients with catheter removal receiving short-duration of antibiotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines suggest 7-14 days' duration of antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). The objectives of this study were to review microbial epidemiology, to determine rate and risk factors for relapse, and to compare clinical outcomes in patients receiving long- versus short-duration antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective phase 1 study was conducted between January 2010 and October 2016 to review microbial epidemiology and to determine the incidence of and risk factors for relapse in patients with GNB CRBSI, according to the IDSA guidelines diagnostic criteria. In phase 2 of the study, patients without risk factors for relapse between November 2016 and October 2017 were prospectively recruited to receive antibiotic therapy for 7 days after catheter removal. Matched patients from the retrospective phase 1 study who had received antibiotic therapy for ≥14 days were selected as a phase 2 control group to compare outcomes. RESULTS: In phase 1, three most common pathogens identified among 174 cases were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (13.4%). Eighty-nine episodes of infection occurred while patients were receiving antibiotic therapy. Of 140 cases, the relapse rate was 6.4%. Catheter retention was the only risk factor strongly associated with relapse (odds ratio = 145.32; 95% confidence interval 12.66-1667.37, P < 0.001). In phase 2, 11 patients with catheter removal were prospectively recruited to receive short-duration therapy. The number of patients with relapse receiving long- or short-duration therapy was 1 (3%) and 0 (0%), respectively (P = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: For the management of patients with uncomplicated GNB CRBSI, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy with adequate coverage of P. aeruginosa should be chosen. Catheter removal should be performed to prevent relapse and shortening the duration of treatment could be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trial Registry: TCTR20190914001 . Retrospectively registered on 13 September 2019.